Export limit exceeded: 30210 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (30210 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-12140 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The Elementor Addons AI Addons – 70 Widgets, Premium Templates, Ultimate Elements plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1 via the render function due to insufficient restrictions on which templates can be included. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to extract data from private or draft templates that they should not have access to.
CVE-2023-28402 2026-04-15 7.2 High
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) BIOS Guard firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2023-29114 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
System logs could be accessed through web management application due to a lack of access control. An attacker can obtain the following sensitive information: •     Wi-Fi access point credentials to which the EV charger can connect. •     APN web address and credentials. •     IPSEC credentials. •     Web interface access credentials for user and admin accounts. •     JuiceBox system components (software installed, model, firmware version, etc.). •     C2G configuration details. •     Internal IP addresses. •     OTA firmware update configurations (DNS servers). All the credentials are stored in logs in an unencrypted plaintext format.
CVE-2023-29134 1 Mediawiki 2 Cargo, Mediawiki 2026-04-15 8.6 High
An issue was discovered in the Cargo extension for MediaWiki through 1.39.3. There is mishandling of backticks to smartSplit.
CVE-2023-31028 2026-04-15 2.8 Low
NVIDIA nvJPEG2000 Library for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where improper input validation might enable an attacker to use a specially crafted input file. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to a partial denial of service.
CVE-2023-32633 2026-04-15 6.7 Medium
Improper input validation in the Intel(R) CSME installer software before version 2328.5.5.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2025-29089 1 Tp-link 3 Ax10, Ax1500, Tp-link 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An issue in TP-Link AX10 Ax1500 v.1.3.10 Build (20230130) allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information
CVE-2023-34424 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
Improper input validation in firmware for some Intel(R) CSME may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access.
CVE-2023-34440 1 Redhat 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2023-36325 2026-04-15 3.7 Low
i2p before 2.3.0 (Java) allows de-anonymizing the public IPv4 and IPv6 addresses of i2p hidden services (aka eepsites) via a correlation attack across the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses that occurs when a tunneled, replayed message has a behavior discrepancy (it may be dropped, or may result in a Wrong Destination response). An attack would take days to complete.
CVE-2023-38654 2026-04-15 8.2 High
Improper input validation for some some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi software for Windows before version 23.20 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access.
CVE-2025-61235 1 Paytef 1 Dataphone A920 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
An issue was discovered in Dataphone A920 v2025.07.161103. A custom packet based on public documentation can be crafted, where some fields can contain arbitrary or trivial data. Normally, such data should cause the device to reject the packet. However, due to a lack of validation, the device accepts it with no authetication and triggers the functionality instead.
CVE-2025-48064 2026-04-15 3.3 Low
GitHub Desktop is an open-source, Electron-based GitHub app designed for git development. Prior to version 3.4.20-beta3, an attacker convincing a user to view a file in a commit of their making in the history view can cause information disclosure by means of Git attempting to access a network share. This affects GitHub Desktop users on Windows that view malicious commits in the history view. macOS users are not affected. When viewing a file diff in the history view GitHub Desktop will call `git log` or `git diff` with the object id (SHA) of the commit, the name of the file, and the old name of the file if the file has been renamed. As a security precaution Git will attempt to fully resolve the old and new path via `realpath`, traversing symlinks, to ensure that the resolved paths reside within the repository working directory. This can lead to Git attempting to access a path that resides on a network share (UNC path) and in doing so Windows will attempt to perform NTLM authentication which passes information such as the computer name, the currently signed in (Windows) user name, and an NTLM hash. GitHub Desktop 3.4.20 and later fix this vulnerability. The beta channel includes the fix in 3.4.20-beta3. As a workaround to use until upgrading is possible, only browse commits in the history view that comes from trusted sources.
CVE-2025-3622 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Xorbits Inference up to 1.4.1. This issue affects the function load of the file xinference/thirdparty/cosyvoice/cli/model.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization.
CVE-2025-20611 2026-04-15 4.7 Medium
Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
CVE-2023-48335 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 3.7 Low
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Webcraftic Hide login page allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Hide login page: from n/a through 1.1.9.
CVE-2023-50737 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
The SE menu contains information used by Lexmark to diagnose device errors. A vulnerability in one of the SE menu routines can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-50733 2026-04-15 8.6 High
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the Web Services feature of newer Lexmark devices.
CVE-2023-50872 1 Accredible Credential.net 1 Accredible Credential.net 2026-04-15 7.5 High
The API in Accredible Credential.net December 6th, 2023 allows an Insecure Direct Object Reference attack that discloses partial information about certificates and their respective holder. NOTE: the excellium-services.com web page about this issue mentions "Vendor says that it's not a security issue."
CVE-2023-52237 1 Siemens 80 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I800nc, Ruggedcom I801 and 77 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The web server of the affected devices allow a low privileged user to access hashes and password salts of all system's users, including admin users. An attacker could use the obtained information to brute force the passwords offline.