Export limit exceeded: 11078 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11078 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-6897 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_update_plugin function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of subscribers for /dev/random read operations by leveraging a late call to the check_ajax_referer function, a related issue to CVE-2016-6896. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7904 | 1 Cmsmadesimple | 1 Cms Made Simple | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple before 2.1.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create accounts via an admin/adduser.php request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7980 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/exec/valider_xml.php in SPIP 3.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute the XML validator on a local file via a crafted valider_xml request. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-7998 to execute arbitrary PHP code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8018 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows authenticated remote attackers to execute unauthorized commands via a crafted user input. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8201 | 1 Brocade | 1 Virtual Traffic Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A CSRF vulnerability in Brocade Virtual Traffic Manager versions released prior to and including 11.0 could allow an attacker to trick a logged-in user into making administrative changes on the traffic manager cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8229 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Lenovo Service Bridge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4 could be exploited by an attacker with access to the DHCP server used by the system where LSB is installed. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8350 | 1 Moxa | 19 Iologik E1200 Series Firmware, Iologik E1210, Iologik E1211 and 16 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Moxa ioLogik E1210, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1211, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1212, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1213, firmware Version V2.5 and prior, ioLogik E1214, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1240, firmware Version V2.3 and prior, ioLogik E1241, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1242, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1260, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E1262, firmware Version V2.4 and prior, ioLogik E2210, firmware versions prior to V3.13, ioLogik E2212, firmware versions prior to V3.14, ioLogik E2214, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2240, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2242, firmware versions prior to V3.12, ioLogik E2260, firmware versions prior to V3.13, and ioLogik E2262, firmware versions prior to V3.12. The web application may not sufficiently verify whether a request was provided by a valid user (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY). | ||||
| CVE-2016-8369 | 1 Lynxspring | 1 Jenesys Bas Bridge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Lynxspring JENEsys BAS Bridge versions 1.1.8 and older. The application does not sufficiently verify if a request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request (CROSS-SITE REQUEST FORGERY). | ||||
| CVE-2016-9714 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Master Data Management Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 10.1, 11.0, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 119727. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9716 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Master Data Management Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management Server 11.0, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 119729. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9730 | 1 Ibm | 2 Qradar Incident Forensics, Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM QRadar Incident Forensics 7.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1999549. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9975 | 1 Ibm | 2 Dashboard Application Services Hub, Jazz For Service Management | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Jazz for Service Management 1.1.2.1 and 1.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1998714. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9991 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Selling And Fulfillment Foundation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sterling Order Management 9.2 through 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 121314. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0045 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Windows DVD Maker in Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows Vista SP2 does not properly parse crafted .msdvd files, which allows attackers to obtain information to compromise a target system, aka "Windows DVD Maker Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-0902 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to a DNS hijacking vulnerability that allows a MITM attacker to force the RubyGems client to download and install gems from a server that the attacker controls. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000008 | 1 Chyrp-lite Project | 1 Chyrp Lite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Chyrp Lite version 2016.04 is vulnerable to a CSRF in the user settings function allowing attackers to hijack the authentication of logged in users to modify account information, including their password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000069 | 1 Oauth2 Proxy Project | 1 Oauth2 Proxy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||