Export limit exceeded: 11065 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11065 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-25151 | 1 Ecessa | 1 Wanworx Wvr-30 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Ecessa WANWorx WVR-30 versions before 10.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to create a new superuser account by tricking an authenticated administrator into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25150 | 1 Ecessa | 2 Shieldlink Sl175ehq, Shieldlink Sl175ehq Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Ecessa ShieldLink SL175EHQ 10.7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add a superuser account by tricking a logged-in administrator into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40119 | 1 Nepstech | 1 Ntpl-xpon1gfevn Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Nepstech Wifi Router xpon (terminal) model NTPL-Xpon1GFEVN v.1.0 Firmware V2.0.1 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the password change function, which allows remote attackers to change the admin password without the user's consent, leading to a potential account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11416 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WIP Incoming Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_option() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50053 | 1 Foundation Platform | 1 Foundation App | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in Foundation.app Foundation platform 1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Web3 authentication process of Foundation, the signed message lacks a nonce (random number) | ||||
| CVE-2021-47722 | 1 Zucchetti | 1 Axess Cloki Access Control | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| Zucchetti Axess CLOKI Access Control 1.64 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate access control settings without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden forms to disable or modify access control parameters by tricking authenticated users into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49965 | 1 Spacex | 1 Starlink Wifi Router Gen2 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi router Gen 2 before 2023.48.0 allows XSS via the ssid and password parameters on the Setup Page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13953 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Sensitive device logger information in ASPECT may be exposed if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41729 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP BEx Analyzer allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40685 | 1 Ibm | 1 Operations Analytics - Log Analysis | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.3 and IBM SmartCloud Analytics – Log Analysis are vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a trusted user into performing unauthorized actions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4600 | 1 Socomec | 1 Net Vision | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision, version 7.20. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick registered users into performing critical actions, such as adding and updating accounts, due to lack of proper sanitisation of the ‘set_param.cgi’ file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4616 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Prisma Browser | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11071 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Permissive Cross-domain Policy with Untrusted Domains vulnerability in local API server of DestinyECM solution(versions described below) which is developed and maintained by Cyberdigm may allow Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, which probabilistically enables JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) via forgery web page.* Due to product customization, version information may differ from the following version description. For further inquiries, please contact the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4463 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Squelch Tabs and Accordions Shortcodes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.4.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24358 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gorilla/csrf provides Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) prevention middleware for Go web applications & services. Prior to 1.7.2, gorilla/csrf does not validate the Origin header against an allowlist. Its executes its validation of the Referer header for cross-origin requests only when it believes the request is being served over TLS. It determines this by inspecting the r.URL.Scheme value. However, this value is never populated for "server" requests per the Go spec, and so this check does not run in practice. This vulnerability allows an attacker who has gained XSS on a subdomain or top level domain to perform authenticated form submissions against gorilla/csrf protected targets that share the same top level domain. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32086 | 1 Intel | 3 Processors, Xeon, Xeon Processors | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| Improperly implemented security check for standard in the DDRIO configuration for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29050 | 1 Liferay | 2 Dxp, Portal | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the terms of use page in Liferay Portal before 7.3.6, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 1, 7.2 before fix pack 11 allows remote attackers to accept the site's terms of use via social engineering and enticing the user to visit a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14616 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Recooty – Job Widget (Old Dashboard) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation on the recooty_save_maybe() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the recooty_key option and inject malicious content into iframe src attributes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27792 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Opal is OBiBa’s core database application for biobanks or epidemiological studies. Prior to version 5.1.1, the protections against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) were insufficient application-wide. The referrer header is checked, and if it is invalid, the server returns 403. However, the referrer header can be dropped from CSRF requests using `<meta name="referrer" content="never">`, effectively bypassing this protection. Version 5.1.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2021-27701 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| SOCIFI Socifi Guest wifi as SAAS is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Socifi wifi portal. The application does not contain a CSRF token and request validation. An attacker can Add/Modify any random user data by sending a crafted CSRF request. | ||||