Export limit exceeded: 94978 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424128 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424128 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 47143 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (47143 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-43451 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Employee Record Management System | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| SQL Injection vulnerability exists in PHPGURUKUL Employee Record Management System 1.2 via the Email POST parameter in /forgetpassword.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43420 | 1 Online Payment Hub Project | 1 Online Payment Hub | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Login.php in Sourcecodester Online Payment Hub v1 by oretnom23, allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the username parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43408 | 1 Duplicate Post Project | 1 Duplicate Post | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| The "Duplicate Post" WordPress plugin up to and including version 1.1.9 is vulnerable to SQL Injection. SQL injection vulnerabilities occur when client supplied data is included within an SQL Query insecurely. SQL Injection can typically be exploited to read, modify and delete SQL table data. In many cases it also possible to exploit features of SQL server to execute system commands and/or access the local file system. This particular vulnerability can be exploited by any authenticated user who has been granted access to use the Duplicate Post plugin. By default, this is limited to Administrators, however the plugin presents the option to permit access to the Editor, Author, Contributor and Subscriber roles. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43329 | 1 Mumara | 1 Classic | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL injection vulnerability in license_update.php in Mumara Classic through 2.93 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the license parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43172 | 1 Nlnetlabs | 1 Routinator | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| NLnet Labs Routinator prior to 0.10.2 happily processes a chain of RRDP repositories of infinite length causing it to never finish a validation run. In RPKI, a CA can choose the RRDP repository it wishes to publish its data in. By continuously generating a new child CA that only consists of another CA using a different RRDP repository, a malicious CA can create a chain of CAs of de-facto infinite length. Routinator prior to version 0.10.2 did not contain a limit on the length of such a chain and will therefore continue to process this chain forever. As a result, the validation run will never finish, leading to Routinator continuing to serve the old data set or, if in the initial validation run directly after starting, never serve any data at all. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43155 | 1 Projectworlds | 1 Online Book Store Project In Php | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Projectsworlds Online Book Store PHP v1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection via the "bookisbn" parameter in cart.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43130 | 1 Customer Relationship Management System Project | 1 Customer Relationship Management System | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An SQL Injection vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Customer Relationship Management System (CRM) 1.0 via the username parameter in customer/login.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43109 | 1 Puneethreddyhc Online-shopping-system Project | 1 Puneethreddyhc Online-shopping-system | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An SQL Injection vulnerability exits in PuneethReddyHC online-shopping-system as of 11/01/2021 via the p parameter in product.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43094 | 1 Openmrs | 2 Openmrs, Reference Application | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An SQL Injection vulnerability exists in OpenMRS Reference Application Standalone Edition <=2.11 and Platform Standalone Edition <=2.4.0 via GET requests on arbitrary parameters in patient.page. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43091 | 1 Yeswiki | 1 Yeswiki | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An SQL Injection vlnerability exits in Yeswiki doryphore 20211012 via the email parameter in the registration form. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43077 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiwlm | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.2 and below, version 8.5.2 and below, version 8.4.2 and below, version 8.3.2 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests to the AP monitor handlers. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43035 | 1 Kaseya | 1 Unitrends Backup | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Kaseya Unitrends Backup Appliance before 10.5.5. Two unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerabilities were discovered, allowing arbitrary SQL queries to be injected and executed under the postgres superuser account. Remote code execution was possible, leading to full access to the postgres user account. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43010 | 1 Safedog | 1 Safedog Apache | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In Safedog Apache v4.0.30255, attackers can bypass this product for SQL injection. Attackers can bypass access to sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42945 | 1 Zzcms | 1 Zzcms | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL Injection vulnerability exists in ZZCMS 2021 via the askbigclassid parameter in /admin/ask.php. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42851 | 1 Lenovo | 10 A1, A1 Firmware, T1 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was reported in some Lenovo Personal Cloud Storage devices that could allow an unauthenticated user to create a standard user account. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42848 | 1 Lenovo | 10 A1, A1 Firmware, T1 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability was reported in some Lenovo Personal Cloud Storage devices that could allow an unauthenticated user to retrieve device and networking details. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42760 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiwlm | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.1 and below allows attacker to disclose sensitive information from DB tables via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42758 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiwlc | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiWLC 8.6.1 and below may allow an authenticated and remote attacker with low privileges to execute any command as an admin user with full access rights via bypassing the GUI restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42715 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Nothings | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Stb Image.h | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in stb stb_image.h 1.33 through 2.27. The HDR loader parsed truncated end-of-file RLE scanlines as an infinite sequence of zero-length runs. An attacker could potentially have caused denial of service in applications using stb_image by submitting crafted HDR files. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42694 | 1 Unicode | 1 Unicode | 2024-11-21 | 8.3 High |
| An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms. | ||||