Export limit exceeded: 11064 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11064 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12170 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The ViewMedica 9 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.15. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'Viewmedica-Admin' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12643 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| The tbm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48930 | 1 Secp256k1-node Project | 1 Secp256k1-node | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| secp256k1-node is a Node.js binding for an Optimized C library for EC operations on curve secp256k1. In `elliptic`-based version, `loadUncompressedPublicKey` has a check that the public key is on the curve. Prior to versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1, however, `loadCompressedPublicKey` is missing that check. That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power. Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. `publicKeyVerify()` incorrectly returning `true` on those invalid keys, and e.g. `publicKeyTweakMul()` also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak. Versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1 contain a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47935 | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in TXOne Networks StellarProtect (Legacy Mode), StellarEnforce, and Safe Lock allows an attacker to escalate their privileges in the victim’s device. The attacker needs to hijack the DLL file in advance. This issue affects StellarProtect (Legacy Mode): before 3.2; StellarEnforce: before 3.2; Safe Lock: from 3.0.0 before 3.1.1076. *Note: StellarProtect (Legacy Mode) is the new name for StellarEnforce, they are the same product. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4600 | 1 Socomec | 1 Net Vision | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision, version 7.20. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick registered users into performing critical actions, such as adding and updating accounts, due to lack of proper sanitisation of the ‘set_param.cgi’ file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44113 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP Business Warehouse (BEx Analyzer) allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4409 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP-ViperGB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43930 | 2 Eyecix, Wordpress | 2 Jobsearch, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eyecix JobSearch allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects JobSearch: from n/a through 2.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42504 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42476 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the Authorization Code grant and Implicit grant both rely on the `state` parameter to prevent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks where a resource owner might have their session associated with protected resources belonging to an attacker. When this project is compiled with certain compiler flags set, it is possible that the `state` parameter will not be checked at all, creating a CSRF vulnerability. Version 0.11 checks the `state` parameter using a regular `if` statement or `doAssert` instead of relying on a plain `assert`. `doAssert` will achieve the desired behavior even if `-d:danger` or `--assertions:off` is set. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42475 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In the OAuth library for nim prior to version 0.11, the `state` values generated by the `generateState` function do not have sufficient entropy. These can be successfully guessed by an attacker allowing them to perform a CSRF vs a user, associating the user's session with the attacker's protected resources. While `state` isn't exactly a cryptographic value, it should be generated in a cryptographically secure way. `generateState` should be using a CSPRNG. Version 0.11 modifies the `generateState` function to generate `state` values of at least 128 bits of entropy while using a CSPRNG. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41729 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Due to missing authorization checks, SAP BEx Analyzer allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38345 | 1 Solaplugins | 1 Sola Testimonials | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Sola Testimonials versions prior to 3.0.0. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38344 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in WP Tweet Walls versions prior to 1.0.4. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3825 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Versions of the BlazeMeter Jenkins plugin prior to 4.22 contain a flaw which results in credential enumeration | ||||
| CVE-2024-36682 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| In the module "Theme settings" (pk_themesettings) <= 1.8.8 from Promokit.eu for PrestaShop, a guest can download all email collected while SHOP is in maintenance mode. Due to a lack of permissions control, a guest can access the txt file which collect email when maintenance is enable which can lead to leak of personal information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36677 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| In the module "Login as customer PRO" (loginascustomerpro) <1.2.7 from Weblir for PrestaShop, a guest can access direct link to connect to each customer account of the Shop if the module is not installed OR if a secret accessible to administrator is stolen. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35657 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plechev Andrey WP-Recall.This issue affects WP-Recall: from n/a through 16.26.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35638 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JumpDEMAND Inc. ActiveDEMAND.This issue affects ActiveDEMAND: from n/a through 0.2.43. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35636 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Uploadcare Uploadcare File Uploader and Adaptive Delivery (beta) uploadcare.This issue affects Uploadcare File Uploader and Adaptive Delivery (beta): from n/a through 3.0.11. | ||||