Export limit exceeded: 17059 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (17059 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-109708 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-10-27 | 9.6 Critical |
| Sandbox escape due to incorrect boundary conditions in the Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 158, Firefox ESR 153.5, Thunderbird 158, Thunderbird 153.5, and Firefox ESR 115.44. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86958 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| The issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An attacker with memory write capability may be able to bypass pointer authentication codes and run arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86969 | 1 Apple | 2 Ios And Ipados, Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination or corrupt kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104078 | 1 Obsidian | 2 Obsidian, Obsidian Desktop | 2026-10-27 | 7.8 High |
| Obsidian Desktop before 1.14.0 contains a filter bypass vulnerability in the bundled MathJax 3.2.2 Safe component that allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by embedding a crafted \href value with a TAB byte in the URL scheme, causing filterURL to produce an empty protocol that bypasses the configured safeProtocols restrictions. Attackers can craft a note containing a malicious MathJax formula that renders as a javascript: URL anchor, which when clicked by the victim in Live Preview executes in the Node-integration-enabled vault renderer via require('child_process'), achieving arbitrary operating system command execution as the desktop user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104077 | 1 Obsidian | 2 Obsidian, Obsidian Desktop | 2026-10-27 | 7.8 High |
| Obsidian Desktop before 1.14.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious Markdown notes exploiting insufficient sanitization of the data-background-iframe attribute, which bypasses DOMPurify and is processed by the bundled Reveal.js 4.3.1 within the Slides core plugin, allowing a javascript: URL to execute in the resulting background iframe. Because Node integration is enabled and context isolation is disabled in Obsidian's vault renderer, the injected script can call parent.require() to access Node APIs such as fs and child_process, enabling arbitrary operating system command execution when the victim opens the note and manually starts the presentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112470 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination or corrupt kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112468 | 1 Apple | 4 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 1 more | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination or corrupt kernel memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112553 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. Processing a maliciously crafted file may lead to unexpected app termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112522 | 1 Apple | 2 Ios And Ipados, Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. Processing a maliciously crafted file may lead to unexpected app termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112683 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27.2. Processing a maliciously crafted font may lead to unexpected app termination or corrupt process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112521 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112488 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, visionOS 27.2. Processing a maliciously crafted image may corrupt process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112451 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-27 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. A remote attacker may be able to cause a denial-of-service or disclose process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112502 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-26 | N/A |
| A buffer overflow was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79847 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 10 Critical |
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets to the affected interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79851 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 10 Critical |
| Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-10 that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79879 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 8.8 High |
| Memory corruption vulnerabilities in the affected interface of AOS-10 could lead to remote code execution by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79888 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability in a certain web interface endpoint of AOS-8 devices could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a buffer overflow. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79889 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerabilities in multiple web interface endpoints of AOS-8 devices could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a buffer overflow by using specially crafted requests. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79891 | 1 Hpe | 1 Aos | 2026-10-26 | 8.1 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the command line interface of AOS-8 that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | ||||