Export limit exceeded: 419136 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1401 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-37908 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-11-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm, slab: clean up slab->obj_exts always When memory allocation profiling is disabled at runtime or due to an error, shutdown_mem_profiling() is called: slab->obj_exts which previously allocated remains. It won't be cleared by unaccount_slab() because of mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() not true. It's incorrect, slab->obj_exts should always be cleaned up in unaccount_slab() to avoid following error: [...]BUG: Bad page state in process... .. [...]page dumped because: page still charged to cgroup [andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com: fold need_slab_obj_ext() into its only user] | ||||
| CVE-2024-11919 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Intents in Google Chrome on Android prior to 129.0.6668.58 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2024-13178 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Fullscreen in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.84 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2024-7021 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2025-13102 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in WebApp Installs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 134.0.6998.35 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2025-13107 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2025-12729 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-11-14 | 4.2 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Omnibox in Google Chrome on Android prior to 142.0.7444.137 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2024-23159 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2025-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted STP file, when parsed in stp_aim_x64_vc15d.dll through Autodesk applications, can be used to uninitialized variables. This vulnerability, along with other vulnerabilities, can lead to code execution in the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37002 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2025-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed in ASMkern229A.dllthrough Autodesk applications, can be used to uninitialized variables. This vulnerability, along with other vulnerabilities, could lead to code execution in the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11208 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-11-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Media in Google Chrome prior to 141.0.7390.54 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2025-11212 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2025-11-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 141.0.7390.54 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2025-11213 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-11-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Omnibox in Google Chrome on Android prior to 141.0.7390.54 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2025-12435 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-11-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in Omnibox in Google Chrome on Android prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2025-12446 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-11-13 | 4.2 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in SplitView in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted domain name. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2023-41835 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| When a Multipart request is performed but some of the fields exceed the maxStringLength limit, the upload files will remain in struts.multipart.saveDir even if the request has been denied. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions Struts 2.5.32 or 6.1.2.2 or Struts 6.3.0.1 or greater, which fixe this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31192 | 1 Softether | 1 Vpn | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the ClientConnect() functionality of SoftEther VPN 5.01.9674. A specially crafted network packet can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47197 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2025-11-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| An insecure default vulnerability exists in the Post Creation functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. Default installations of Ghost allow non-administrator users to inject arbitrary Javascript in posts, which allow privilege escalation to administrator via XSS. To trigger this vulnerability, an attacker can send an HTTP request to inject Javascript in a post to trick an administrator into visiting the post.A stored XSS vulnerability exists in the `codeinjection_foot` for a post. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47196 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2025-11-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| An insecure default vulnerability exists in the Post Creation functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. Default installations of Ghost allow non-administrator users to inject arbitrary Javascript in posts, which allow privilege escalation to administrator via XSS. To trigger this vulnerability, an attacker can send an HTTP request to inject Javascript in a post to trick an administrator into visiting the post.A stored XSS vulnerability exists in the `codeinjection_head` for a post. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47195 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2025-11-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| An insecure default vulnerability exists in the Post Creation functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. Default installations of Ghost allow non-administrator users to inject arbitrary Javascript in posts, which allow privilege escalation to administrator via XSS. To trigger this vulnerability, an attacker can send an HTTP request to inject Javascript in a post to trick an administrator into visiting the post.A stored XSS vulnerability exists in the `facebook` field for a user. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47194 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2025-11-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| An insecure default vulnerability exists in the Post Creation functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. Default installations of Ghost allow non-administrator users to inject arbitrary Javascript in posts, which allow privilege escalation to administrator via XSS. To trigger this vulnerability, an attacker can send an HTTP request to inject Javascript in a post to trick an administrator into visiting the post.A stored XSS vulnerability exists in the `twitter` field for a user. | ||||