Export limit exceeded: 424950 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424950 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424950 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (424950 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-111434 | 1 Openeuler | 1 Isula | 2026-11-12 | 5.6 Medium |
| Use of Externally-Controlled format string vulnerability in openEuler iSulad on Linux. This vulnerability is associated with program file src/daemon/modules/image/oci/oci_load.c. This issue affects iSulad: through 2.1.6. When the iSulad daemon performs container lifecycle operations (such as create, start, exec, stop, etc.) through the isula runtime (shim), the daemon reads the stderr output of the shim process via a pipe for error information display. If the buffer contains format specifiers such as %s, %x, or %n, it may trigger a format string vulnerability, potentially leading to information leakage, denial of service, or the risk of arbitrary writes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111435 | 1 Openeuler | 1 Isula | 2026-11-12 | 7.4 High |
| Relative path traversal vulnerability in openEuler iSulad on Linux. This vulnerability is associated with program file src/daemon/modules/image/oci/oci_load.c. This issue affects iSulad: through 2.1.6. In oci_load.c, oci_load_process_manifest() does not sanitize the Config path of manifest.json. A malicious tar package can enable the isulad with the root permission to read any file on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111436 | 1 Openeuler | 1 Isula | 2026-11-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Missing release of memory after effective lifetime vulnerability in openEuler iSulad on Linux. This vulnerability is associated with program file src/daemon/modules/spec/specs_mount.c. This issue affects iSulad: through 2.1.6. The memory leak vulnerability causes the iSulad daemon to be triggered frequently, exhausting the host machine's memory and ultimately leading to an OOM crash of the daemon, resulting in a denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101107 | 1 Softbank Corp. | 1 Air Terminal 6 | 2026-11-12 | N/A |
| An OS command Injection issue exists in Air Terminal 6 provided by SoftBank Corp. Arbitrary commands may be executed with the root privilege by a user who can log in to the web management console of the affected product. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106027 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Oxygen Mydata For Woocommerce | 2026-11-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Oxygen MyData for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 3.0.9 does not have proper authorisation, nor validate the authenticity of the request, on one of its payment callbacks, allowing unauthenticated users to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as completed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105991 | 1 Ibm | 2 Agentics, Db2 Genius Hub | 2026-11-12 | 3.5 Low |
| IBM Db2 Genius Hub 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a missing Content Security Policy header. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110041 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Crop-thumbnails | 2026-11-12 | 3.8 Low |
| The Crop Thumbnails WordPress plugin before 1.10.0 does not perform object-level authorization when reading and re-cropping media attachments, allowing any authenticated user with the upload capability (the Author role by default) to read the metadata of, and overwrite the generated thumbnail files and stored metadata of, media attachments belonging to other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110959 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Descope | 2026-11-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Descope WordPress plugin before 1.2.0 does not validate the authentication token it receives before creating a WordPress session, accepting any non-empty token, so an unauthenticated attacker can obtain a session for any existing account, including an administrator, by supplying that account's email address. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121498 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Askany | 2026-11-12 | 4.8 Medium |
| The AskAny WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not verify that a chat session belongs to the requester before returning or changing it, allowing unauthenticated users who obtain or guess another visitor's session identifier to read that visitor's chat transcript, name, email address and IP address, and to add messages to their conversation or overwrite their details. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64471 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on registration failure Make sure to release the sibling interfaces in case controller registration fails to avoid use-after-free and double-free when they are eventually disconnected. This issue was reported by Sashiko while reviewing a fix for a wakeup source leak in the btusb probe errors paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64470 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btusb: fix use-after-free on marvell probe failure Make sure to stop any TX URBs submitted during Marvell OOB wakeup configuration on later probe failures to avoid use-after-free in the completion callback. This issue was reported by Sashiko while reviewing a fix for a wakeup source leak in the btusb probe errors paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-127145 | 2026-11-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SOGo before 5.12.13 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users to make the server connect to arbitrary internal host:port destinations by supplying a user-controlled URL to the Calendar/addWebCalendar endpoint. Attackers can trigger a reload of the subscribed web calendar via the reload endpoint and distinguish response outcomes such as connection failures, timeouts, authentication prompts, or invalid content to probe the internal network from the server's position. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126145 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated administrator with system-time read-write access to execute unauthorized code or commands as root. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126146 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimail, Fortirecorder | 2026-11-12 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, FortiRecorder 7.6.0, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiRecorder 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specifically crafted archive account configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126149 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash the daemon. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126158 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.2 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1 may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized code or commands as root via specially crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126153 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126151 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| A incorrect implementation of authentication algorithm vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain elevation of privilege (account takeover) via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126152 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 7.6 High |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to delete arbitrary directories as root, or to access or delete other users' calendar and mailbox data across tenant domains, via crafted HTTP requests to the webmail and administrative interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126156 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-12 | 9.1 Critical |
| A authorization bypass through user-controlled key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to take over an arbitrary IBE recipient account via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||