| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.1 is affected. The issue involves the "Contacts" component, which does not prevent an app's Address Book access after access revocation. |
| ZOHO ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus before 9.0 allows remote authenticated guest users to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to restrict access to unknown functions. |
| SetsucoCMS all versions does not properly manage sessions, which allows remote attackers to disclose or alter unauthorized information via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM Distributed Marketing 8.6, 9.0, and 10.0 could allow a privileged authenticated user to create an instance that gets created with security profile not valid for the templates, that results in the new instance not accessible for the intended user. IBM X-Force ID: 116379. |
| IBM Jazz technology based products might allow an attacker to view work item titles that they do not have privilege to view. |
| IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, 7.1, and 7.2 contains an unspecified vulnerability that would allow a locally authenticated user to obtain root level privileges. IBM APARs: IV88658, IV87981, IV88419, IV87640, IV88053. |
| IBM Distributed Marketing and Marketing Platform 8.6, 9.0, 9.1, and 10.0 could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges and gain administrative permissions over the web application. IBM X-Force ID: 118282. |
| Trend Micro Smart Protection Server 2.5 before build 2200, 2.6 before build 2106, and 3.0 before build 1330 allows local webserv users to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a Trojan horse .war file in the Solr webapps directory. |
| The scm plug-in in mock might allow attackers to bypass the intended chroot protection mechanism and gain root privileges via a crafted spec file. |
| The Qualcomm GPS subsystem in Android on Android One devices allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| The SmartCall Activity component in Telecom application on Samsung Note device L(5.0/5.1) and M(6.0) allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reboot) or possibly gain privileges via a malformed serializable object. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in Wi-Fi could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of a privileged process. This issue is rated as Moderate because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0. Android ID: A-31856351. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the MediaTek I2C driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: N/A. Android ID: A-31224428. References: MT-ALPS02943467. |
| The Apache OpenOffice installer (versions prior to 4.1.3, including some branded as OpenOffice.org) for Windows contains a defective operation that allows execution of arbitrary code with elevated privileges. This requires that the location in which the installer is run has been previously poisoned by a file that impersonates a dynamic-link library that the installer depends upon. |
| In Apache Hadoop 2.x before 2.7.4, a user who can escalate to yarn user can possibly run arbitrary commands as root user. |
| lshell 0.9.16 allows remote authenticated users to break out of a limited shell and execute arbitrary commands. |
| Privilege escalation in Lenovo Customer Care Software Development Kit (CCSDK) versions earlier than 2.0.16.3 allows local users to execute code with elevated privileges. |
| Remote code execution in Lenovo Updates (not Lenovo System Update) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| An issue was discovered in OSIsoft PI Web API 2015 R2 (Version 1.5.1). There is a weakness in this product that may allow an attacker to access the PI system without the proper permissions. |
| An issue was discovered in Lynxspring JENEsys BAS Bridge versions 1.1.8 and older. A user with read-only access can send commands to the software and the application will accept those commands. This would allow an attacker with read-only access to make changes within the application. |