Export limit exceeded: 30000 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11059 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-29093 | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saleswonder Team: Tobias Builder for WooCommerce reviews shortcodes – ReviewShort woo-product-reviews-shortcode.This issue affects Builder for WooCommerce reviews shortcodes – ReviewShort: from n/a through <= 1.01.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27195 | 2026-04-23 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in sverde1 Watermark RELOADED watermark-reloaded allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Watermark RELOADED: from n/a through <= 1.3.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25932 | 1 Youngtechleads | 1 Change Table Prefix | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Manish Kumar Agarwal Change Table Prefix change-table-prefix allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Change Table Prefix: from n/a through <= 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4121 | 2 Ksolves, Wordpress | 2 Kcaptcha, Wordpress | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Kcaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the plugin's settings page handler (admin/setting.php). The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field() and the form processing code does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before saving settings to the database via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's CAPTCHA settings (enabling or disabling CAPTCHA on login, registration, lost password, and comment forms) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4133 | 2 Textp2p, Wordpress | 2 Textp2p Texting Widget, Wordpress | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1339 | 1 Twiki | 1 Twiki | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TWiki before 4.3.1 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that update pages, as demonstrated by a URL for a save script in the SRC attribute of an IMG element, a related issue to CVE-2009-1434. | ||||
| CVE-2008-5028 | 2 Nagios, Op5 | 2 Nagios, Monitor | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmd.cgi in (1) Nagios 3.0.5 and (2) op5 Monitor before 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to send commands to the Nagios process, and trigger execution of arbitrary programs by this process, via unspecified HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2007-3416 | 2 Web-app.org, Web App.net | 2 Webapp, Webapp | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the administration of (1) polls, (2) profiles, (3) IP bans, and (4) forums in (a) web-app.org WebAPP 0.8 through 0.9.9.6; and (b) web-app.net WebAPP 0.9.9.3.3, 0.9.9.3.4, and 2007; allow remote attackers to perform deletions as administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2007-3457 | 1 Adobe | 1 Flash Player | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Adobe Flash Player 8.0.34.0 and earlier insufficiently validates HTTP Referer headers, which might allow remote attackers to conduct a CSRF attack via a crafted SWF file. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5572 | 1 Sphpblog | 1 Sphpblog | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple PHP Blog (SPHPBlog) 0.4.9 allow remote attackers to perform delete actions as administrators via (1) the block_id parameter to add_block.php or (2) the link_id parameter to add_link.php. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5575 | 1 Treble Designs | 1 1024 Cms | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 1024 CMS 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by (1) an unspecified action that creates a file containing PHP code and (2) unspecified use of the forum component. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5594 | 2 Drupal, Fedoraproject | 2 Drupal, Fedora | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Drupal 5.x before 5.3 does not apply its Drupal Forms API protection against the user deletion form, which allows remote attackers to delete users via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5773 | 1 Flatnuke3 | 1 Flatnuke3 | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in the File Manager module in Flatnuke 3 allows remote attackers to perform certain actions as administrators via requests containing the pathname in the dir parameter and the filename in the ffile parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5799 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in uddigui/navigateTree.do in the UDDI user console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) before 6.1.0 Fix Pack 13 (6.1.0.13) allow remote attackers to perform some actions as WAS UDDI users via the (1) keyField, (2) nameField, (3) valueField, and (4) frameReturn parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5818 | 1 Sblog | 1 Sblog | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in blocks_edit_do.php in sBlog 0.7.3 Beta allows remote attackers to change arbitrary blocks as administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5828 | 1 Django Project | 1 Django | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin panel in Django 0.96 allows remote attackers to change passwords of arbitrary users via a request to admin/auth/user/1/password/. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by Debian, since product documentation includes a recommendation for a CSRF protection module that is included with the product. However, CVE considers this an issue because the default configuration does not use this module | ||||
| CVE-2007-5917 | 1 Skalinks | 1 Skalinks | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/admin_account.php in Skalinks 1.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to add arbitrary privileged accounts as administrators via the admin_name, admin_password, admin_type, and Add_admin parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5918 | 1 Ms Topsites | 1 Ms Topsites | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edit.php in the MS TopSites add-on for PHP-Nuke does not verify that the uname parameter matches the current account, which allows remote authenticated users to change arbitrary accounts or change the SiteTitleName field as an arbitrary user via a modified uname value in an edit action to modules.php. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5960 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 4 Firefox, Seamonkey, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Mozilla Firefox before 2.0.0.10 and SeaMonkey before 1.1.7 sets the Referer header to the window or frame in which script is running, instead of the address of the content that initiated the script, which allows remote attackers to spoof HTTP Referer headers and bypass Referer-based CSRF protection schemes by setting window.location and using a modal alert dialog that causes the wrong Referer to be sent. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1106 | 2 Akamai Technologies, Red Swoosh | 2 Client, Client | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The management interface in Akamai Client (formerly Red Swoosh) 3322 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an HTTP request that contains (1) no Referer header, or (2) a spoofed Referer header that matches an approved domain, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and force the client to download and execute arbitrary files. | ||||