| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The management interface in Akamai Client (formerly Red Swoosh) 3322 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an HTTP request that contains (1) no Referer header, or (2) a spoofed Referer header that matches an approved domain, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and force the client to download and execute arbitrary files. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Linksys WAG54GS Wireless-G ADSL Gateway with 1.01.03 and earlier firmware allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via an arbitrary valid request to an administrative URI, as demonstrated by (1) a Restore Factory Defaults action using the mtenRestore parameter to setup.cgi and (2) creation of a user account using the sysname parameter to setup.cgi. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Joomla! before 1.5 RC4 allow remote attackers to (1) add a Super Admin, (2) upload an extension containing arbitrary PHP code, and (3) modify the configuration as administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Falcon Series One CMS 1.4.3 allows remote attackers to change a password via a certain changepass action to index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the balancer-manager in mod_proxy_balancer for Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. |
| Gadu-Gadu does not properly perform protocol handling, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and add arbitrary user accounts or cause a denial of service as administrators via an unspecified "crafted link," possibly related to the gg protocol. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the mycalendar plugin before 0.13 for Serendipity allows remote attackers to perform actions as blog administrators, which can be leveraged to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks on the blog page. |
| Feature 4.7.x-dev and 5.x-dev before 20071206, a Drupal module, does not follow Drupal's Forms API submission model, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fusion News 3.9.0 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions via unspecified vectors. |
| Drupal 5.x before 5.3 does not apply its Drupal Forms API protection against the user deletion form, which allows remote attackers to delete users via a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 1024 CMS 1.2.5 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by (1) an unspecified action that creates a file containing PHP code and (2) unspecified use of the forum component. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple PHP Blog (SPHPBlog) 0.4.9 allow remote attackers to perform delete actions as administrators via (1) the block_id parameter to add_block.php or (2) the link_id parameter to add_link.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Thomson/Alcatel SpeedTouch 7G router, as used for the BT Home Hub 6.2.6.B and earlier, allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via unspecified POST requests, as demonstrated by enabling an inbound remote-assistance HTTPS session on TCP port 51003. NOTE: an authentication bypass can be leveraged to exploit this in the absence of an existing administrative session. NOTE: SpeedTouch 780 might also be affected by some of these issues. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ilient SysAid 4.5.03 and 4.5.04 allows remote attackers to perform some actions as administrators, as demonstrated by changing the administrator password. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Helm 3.2.16 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the showOption parameter to domain.asp, or the (2) Folder or (3) StartPath parameter to FileManager.asp. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FeedBurner FeedSmith 2.2 plugin for WordPress allows remote attackers to change settings and hijack blog feeds via a request to wp-admin/options-general.php that submits parameter values to FeedBurner_FeedSmith_Plugin.php, as demonstrated by the (1) feedburner_url and (2) feedburner_comments_url parameters. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the AXIS 2100 Network Camera 2.02 with firmware 2.43 and earlier allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators, as demonstrated by (1) an SMTP server change through the conf_SMTP_MailServer1 parameter to ServerManager.srv and (2) a hostname change through the conf_Network_HostName parameter on the Network page. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in FlatNuke 2.6, and possibly 3, allows remote attackers to change the password and privilege level of arbitrary accounts via the user parameter and modified (1) regpass and (2) level parameters in a none_Login action, as demonstrated by using a Flash object to automatically make the request. |
| The AutoCatSet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the autocatset_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger automatic recategorization of posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Comment Info Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the options.php file when handling form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
