Export limit exceeded: 419231 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419231 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419231 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (419231 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-113212 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in PDF in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113176 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Information leak in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak sensitive information via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113150 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Race condition in Bindings in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113078 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 9.6 Critical |
| Race condition in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113026 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Information loss in PDF in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113333 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Race condition in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113127 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Confused deputy in Browser in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy into a privileged page via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113129 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113220 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Missing authorization in Extensions in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-113275 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| Missing authorization in API in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via a crafted Chrome extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-28643 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59047 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99270 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-11-04 | 8.1 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: Fix potential UAF in reqsk_timer_handler(). When TCP socket migration fails at inet_ehash_insert() in reqsk_timer_handler(), we jump to the no_ownership: label and free the new reqsk immediately with __reqsk_free(). Thus, we must stop the new reqsk's timer before jumping to the label, but the timer might be missed since the cited commit, resulting in UAF. As we are in the original reqsk's timer context, we can safely call timer_delete_sync() for the new reqsk. Let's pass false to __inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop() to stop the new reqsk's timer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102703 | 2026-11-04 | N/A | ||
| [This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] A common access pattern is a batch of Grant Copy operations acting on adjacent address ranges in the same source or destination page. For performance reasons, Xen caches details internally to reuse already validated data. The conditions on when to re-validate the internal data were not correct in some cases: - Frame numbers and grant references could wrongly be mixed up. This is CVE-2026-102703. - Copying by frame number (rather than grant reference) is permitted only when operating on the caller's own memory. The check to enforce this restriction was misplaced. This is CVE-2026-102704. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108500 | 1 Apache | 1 Activemq | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| Input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ configured to use the LDAPAuthorizationMapPlugin allows an authenticated attacker to create or address a destination with a crafted name containing LDAP DN special characters (such as comma, plus, equals, backslash) can manipulate the LDAP search base used for ACL lookups. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: from 6.3.0 before 6.3.3, from 5.19.0 before 5.19.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0, 6.3.3 or 5.19.12, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100235 | 1 Apache | 1 Zookeeper | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| Incorrect authorization due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the setACL request handling of Apache ZooKeeper. When a node's ACL is changed via setACL, the pending change is not published to the server's outstanding change record for that node. Any request that is prepared (and authorized) after the setACL is submitted but before it commits is therefore checked against the previous, pre-revocation ACL, yet is applied to the data tree after the ACL change has taken effect. A client that currently holds a permission can use this window to perform operations requiring that permission through and after its revocation — for example, committing writes or deletes after losing write access, or re-granting itself full permissions, which persistently defeats the revocation. In deployments transitioning from the default OPEN_ACL_UNSAFE ACL to a restrictive ACL, any unauthenticated client can exploit this during the transition. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper up to and including 3.9.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.8 or 3.9.7, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100252 | 1 Apache | 1 Zookeeper | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache ZooKeeper. When SASL authentication is enabled on the client port, the server's SASL callback handler grants every authorization identity (authzid) that a client requests, without checking it against the principal the client authenticated as. The server then tries to replace the requested identity with a canonical form of the authenticated principal, derived from the zookeeper.security.auth_to_local rules. If no rule applies to the principal, canonicalization fails and the error is only logged. The client-requested authzid then becomes the session's SASL identity for all ACL checks. An authenticated client whose principal is not covered by the auth_to_local rules can therefore claim any SASL identity. With the default rules, this includes any Kerberos principal from a realm other than the server's default realm, such as a principal from a cross-realm trusted realm. The client then gets the permissions granted to that identity in sasl ACLs. If the requested identity matches a configured zookeeper.superUser, it gets superuser access to the whole data tree. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.8 or 3.9.7, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100300 | 1 Apache | 1 Zookeeper | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| Improper handling of exceptional conditions in the quota subsystem of Apache ZooKeeper allows an attacker able to write under the /zookeeper/quota subtree — unauthenticated on default deployments, where that subtree is world-writable — to crash the server's critical request-processing thread and render the on-disk data directory permanently unbootable. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper up to and including 3.9.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.8 or 3.9.7, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100302 | 1 Apache | 1 Zookeeper | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in the multiRead request handler of Apache ZooKeeper allows a remote attacker to crash the server (denial of service) with a single small request. The multiRead handler places no limit on the number of bundled read operations or on the cumulative size of the response it builds in memory. Because each operation's result is fully materialized and retained before serialization, a request that is small on the wire — within the jute.maxbuffer limit — but that references a large znode many times can force the server to allocate far more heap than the request size implies, exhausting the JVM heap and terminating the server with an OutOfMemoryError. Neither jute.maxbuffer nor largeRequestMaxBytes prevents this, as both bound only the inbound request, not the response. This issue affects Apache ZooKeeper from 3.7.0 through 3.9.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.7, which enforces configurable limits on the multiRead operation count and cumulative response size. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121147 | 1 Tata Motors | 2 Tata Motors Ira.ev, Tata Motors Ira 2.0 | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the iRA 2.0 and iRA.ev mobile applications due to improper implementation of SSL certificate pinning in the network security configuration, resulting in ineffective certificate pinning controls. An attacker positioned to intercept network traffic could exploit this vulnerability to intercept or modify communications between the application and its backend services. | ||||