Export limit exceeded: 419231 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (717 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-1285 | 2 Redhat, Sun | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jsf | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Sun Java Server Faces (JSF) 1.2 before 1.2_08 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2009-2405 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web Console in the Application Server in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2.0 before 4.2.0.CP08, 4.2.2GA, 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07, and 5.1.0GA allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) monitorName, (2) objectName, (3) attribute, or (4) period parameter to createSnapshot.jsp, or the (5) monitorName, (6) objectName, (7) attribute, (8) threshold, (9) period, or (10) enabled parameter to createThresholdMonitor.jsp. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1380 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in JMX-Console in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter, related to the key property and the position of quote and colon characters. | ||||
| CVE-2008-1232 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Tomcat, Certificate System, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted string that is used in the message argument to the HttpServletResponse.sendError method. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5461 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Tomcat, Certificate System, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Absolute path traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, 4.1.0, 5.0.0, 5.5.0 through 5.5.25, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, under certain configurations, allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a WebDAV write request that specifies an entity with a SYSTEM tag. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0783 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 7 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18 permits web applications to replace an XML parser used for other web applications, which allows local users to read or modify the (1) web.xml, (2) context.xml, or (3) tld files of arbitrary web applications via a crafted application that is loaded earlier than the target application. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0580 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Tomcat, Certificate System, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, when FORM authentication is used, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via requests to /j_security_check with malformed URL encoding of passwords, related to improper error checking in the (1) MemoryRealm, (2) DataSourceRealm, and (3) JDBCRealm authentication realms, as demonstrated by a % (percent) value for the j_password parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0455 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 3 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the mod_negotiation module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.6 and earlier in the 2.2.x series, 2.0.61 and earlier in the 2.0.x series, and 1.3.39 and earlier in the 1.3.x series allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by uploading a file with a name containing XSS sequences and a file extension, which leads to injection within a (1) "406 Not Acceptable" or (2) "300 Multiple Choices" HTTP response when the extension is omitted in a request for the file. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0217 | 4 Ibm, Mono Project, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Websphere Application Server, Mono, Application Server and 6 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The design of the W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) recommendation, as implemented in products including (1) the Oracle Security Developer Tools component in Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3, 10.1.3.4, and 10.1.4.3IM; (2) the WebLogic Server component in BEA Product Suite 10.3, 10.0 MP1, 9.2 MP3, 9.1, 9.0, and 8.1 SP6; (3) Mono before 2.4.2.2; (4) XML Security Library before 1.2.12; (5) IBM WebSphere Application Server Versions 6.0 through 6.0.2.33, 6.1 through 6.1.0.23, and 7.0 through 7.0.0.1; (6) Sun JDK and JRE Update 14 and earlier; (7) Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 through 3.0 SP2, 3.5, and 4.0; and other products uses a parameter that defines an HMAC truncation length (HMACOutputLength) but does not require a minimum for this length, which allows attackers to spoof HMAC-based signatures and bypass authentication by specifying a truncation length with a small number of bits. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5342 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The default catalina.policy in the JULI logging component in Apache Tomcat 5.5.9 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.15 does not restrict certain permissions for web applications, which allows attackers to modify logging configuration options and overwrite arbitrary files, as demonstrated by changing the (1) level, (2) directory, and (3) prefix attributes in the org.apache.juli.FileHandler handler. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0027 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2008-5515 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Tomcat, Certificate System, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.39, 5.5.0 through 5.5.27, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, and possibly earlier versions normalizes the target pathname before filtering the query string when using the RequestDispatcher method, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and conduct directory traversal attacks via .. (dot dot) sequences and the WEB-INF directory in a Request. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0002 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Rhel Application Stack | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 6.0.0 through 6.0.15 processes parameters in the context of the wrong request when an exception occurs during parameter processing, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by disconnecting during this processing in order to trigger the exception. | ||||
| CVE-2010-1871 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 5 Oncommand Balance, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Unified Manager and 2 more | 2026-04-22 | 8.8 High |
| JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12149 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1190 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-18 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's SAML brokering functionality. When Keycloak is configured as a client in a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) setup, it fails to validate the `NotOnOrAfter` timestamp within the `SubjectConfirmationData`. This allows an attacker to delay the expiration of SAML responses, potentially extending the time a response is considered valid and leading to unexpected session durations or resource consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2733 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.8 Low |
| A flaw was identified in the Docker v2 authentication endpoint of Keycloak, where tokens continue to be issued even after a Docker registry client has been administratively disabled. This means that turning the client “Enabled” setting to OFF does not fully prevent access. As a result, previously valid credentials can still be used to obtain authentication tokens. This weakens administrative controls and could allow unintended access to container registry resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0871 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-users` permission can bypass the "Only administrators can view" setting for unmanaged attributes, allowing them to modify these attributes. This improper access control can lead to unauthorized changes to user profiles, even when the system is configured to restrict such modifications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3009 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 8.1 High |
| A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1035 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak server during refresh token processing, specifically in the TokenManager class responsible for enforcing refresh token reuse policies. When strict refresh token rotation is enabled, the validation and update of refresh token usage are not performed atomically. This allows concurrent refresh requests to bypass single-use enforcement and issue multiple access tokens from the same refresh token. As a result, Keycloak’s refresh token rotation hardening can be undermined. | ||||