Export limit exceeded: 421050 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 421050 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4197 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-4894 | 1 Itpison | 1 Omicard Edm | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| ITPison OMICARD EDM fails to properly filter specific URL parameter, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to modify the parameters and conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. This vulnerability enables attackers to probe internal network information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50714 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in smarts-srl.com Smart Agent v.1.1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the /FB/getFbVideoSource.php component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48450 | 1 Hcengineering | 1 Huly | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in Huly Platform v0.6.295 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted HTML file into chat group. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50811 | 1 Tendcode | 1 Izone | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). | ||||
| CVE-2025-25229 | 1 Omnissa | 1 Workspace One | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability. A malicious actor with user privileges may be able to access restricted internal system information, potentially enabling enumeration of internal network resources. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48234 | 1 Mipjz Project | 1 Mipjz | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in mipjz 5.0.5. In the push method of app\tag\controller\ApiAdminTag.php the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46385 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2024-41668 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. When running a publicly exposed proxy endpoint without authentication, cBioPortal could allow someone to perform a Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack. Logged in users could do the same on private instances. A fix has been released in version 6.0.12. As a workaround, one might be able to disable `/proxy` endpoint entirely via, for example, nginx. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60279 | 1 Illia Cloud | 1 Illia-builder | 2026-04-15 | 9.6 Critical |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Illia Cloud illia-Builder before v4.8.5 allows authenticated users to send arbitrary requests to internal services via the API. An attacker can leverage this to enumerate open ports based on response discrepancies and interact with internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51358 | 1 Linuxserver | 1 Heimdall Application Dashboard | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Linux Server Heimdall v.2.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the Add new application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51981 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41664 | 1 Thinkst | 1 Canarytokens | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Canarytokens help track activity and actions on a network. Prior to `sha-8ea5315`, Canarytokens.org was vulnerable to a blind SSRF in the Webhook alert feature. When a Canarytoken is created, users choose to receive alerts either via email or via a webhook. If a webhook is supplied when a Canarytoken is first created, the site will make a test request to the supplied URL to ensure it accepts alert notification HTTP requests. No safety checks were performed on the URL, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. The SSRF is Blind because the content of the response is not displayed to the creating user; they are simply told whether an error occurred in making the test request. Using the Blind SSRF, it was possible to map out open ports for IPs inside the Canarytokens.org infrastructure. This issue is now patched on Canarytokens.org. Users of self-hosted Canarytokens installations can update by pulling the latest Docker image, or any Docker image after `sha-097d91a`. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40718 | 1 Veeam | 2 Backup For Nutanix Ahv, Backup For Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager And Red Hat Virtualization | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A server side request forgery vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to perform local privilege escalation through exploiting an SSRF vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40632 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Linkerd is an open source, ultralight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. In affected versions when the application being run by linkerd is susceptible to SSRF, an attacker could potentially trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by making requests to localhost:4191/shutdown. Linkerd could introduce an optional environment variable to control a token that must be passed as a header. Linkerd should reject shutdown requests that do not include this header. This issue has been addressed in release version edge-24.6.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54197 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Administrator(System Overview) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which could have a low impact on integrity and confidentiality of data. It has no impact on availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38514 | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High | ||
| NextChat is a cross-platform ChatGPT/Gemini UI. There is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability due to a lack of validation of the `endpoint` GET parameter on the WebDav API endpoint. This SSRF can be used to perform arbitrary HTTPS request from the vulnerable instance (MKCOL, PUT and GET methods supported), or to target NextChat users and make them execute arbitrary JavaScript code in their browser. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.12.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37359 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests. By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36458 | 1 Broadcom | 1 Symantec Privileged Access Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The vulnerability allows a malicious low-privileged PAM user to perform server upgrade related actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11970 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| The Emplibot – AI Content Writer with Keyword Research, Infographics, and Linking | SEO Optimized | Fully Automated plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9 via the emplibot_call_webhook_with_error() and emplibot_process_zip_data() functions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36427 | 1 Targit | 1 Decision Suite | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The file-serving function in TARGIT Decision Suite before 24.06.19002 (TARGIT Decision Suite 2024 – June) allows authenticated attackers to read or write to server files via a crafted file request. This can allow code execution via a .xview file. | ||||